IBM stock suffered one of the steepest falls in the company’s modern market history on Tuesday, 14 July 2026, after the technology group unexpectedly published preliminary second-quarter figures showing weaker revenue, slower software growth and a deeper-than-forecast decline in its infrastructure division. The IBM share price fell by about 25% during US trading as corporate customers redirected money towards servers, storage and memory equipment before expected AI-related supply shortages and price rises, The WP Times reports.
The warning matters because IBM has spent years trying to convince investors that it is becoming a more predictable, software-led cloud and artificial intelligence company rather than a business dependent on cyclical mainframe replacement programmes. Instead, its preliminary results showed that a sudden change in customer purchasing priorities disrupted both mainframe hardware sales and the software commonly sold alongside those systems. IBM also acknowledged that several large deals did not close when expected, while clients were reassessing cybersecurity expenditure amid rapidly developing AI-related threats.
Why did the IBM share price fall by about 25%
The immediate reason for the collapse in the IBM share price was a clear miss against Wall Street expectations. IBM said preliminary second-quarter revenue was approximately $17.2 billion, representing growth of only 1% from the same period a year earlier. Analysts had expected roughly $17.86 billion, according to estimates cited by Reuters and the Associated Press. IBM also projected adjusted operating earnings of $2.93 per share, below market expectations of approximately $3.01 to $3.02. On a generally accepted accounting principles basis, diluted earnings were expected to be $2.27 per share, down 2% year on year.
The scale of the market reaction reflected more than a relatively modest revenue miss. Investors were concerned that the figures exposed a weakness in IBM’s attempt to generate reliable growth from software, hybrid cloud services and artificial intelligence products.
At approximately 18:56 UTC on 14 July, IBM stock was trading near $218.90, down $71.33 from the previous close. The shares had opened at about $226 after trading as high as $288.54 and as low as $213.34 during the session. Trading volume had exceeded 54 million shares, indicating exceptionally heavy selling. If the decline is sustained into the closing bell, it would rank among IBM’s worst one-day share-price falls and could exceed the percentage loss recorded during the Black Monday market crash of October 1987. Reuters estimated that the fall was on course to remove about $70 billion from IBM’s market value.
IBM preliminary Q2 results compared with expectations
| Financial measure | IBM preliminary result | Market expectation or comparison |
|---|---|---|
| Total revenue | $17.2bn | About $17.86bn |
| Annual revenue growth | 1% | Weakest growth in more than a year |
| Adjusted operating EPS | $2.93 | About $3.01–$3.02 |
| GAAP diluted EPS | $2.27 | Down 2% year on year |
| Software revenue growth | 5% | Below IBM’s recent growth profile |
| Consulting revenue | Flat | Up 1% at constant currency |
| Infrastructure revenue | Down 7% | IBM had expected a smaller decline |
| Operating gross margin | 59.4% | Down 70 basis points |
| Year-to-date free cash flow | $4.8bn | Preliminary company figure |
IBM stressed that these figures remain preliminary and that its completed financial statements could differ slightly when full second-quarter results are released.
How AI infrastructure spending damaged IBM’s Q2 performance
IBM’s explanation centred on a rapid change in how large organisations allocated their technology budgets during the closing weeks of June. Companies facing an increasingly expensive AI infrastructure market began bringing forward purchases of servers, data storage and memory. Demand for AI data centres has tightened supplies of several important components, increasing fears that prices may rise or that equipment may become more difficult to obtain.
That created an unusual situation for IBM. Although the AI investment cycle is generally considered positive for the technology industry, it diverted money away from some of IBM’s most important software and mainframe products.
“In the last few weeks of June, we saw clients shift their quarterly capex spend toward servers, storage, and memory purchases to secure supply-constrained infrastructure ahead of expected price increases” (Arvind Krishna, letter to IBM investors, 14 July 2026). IBM said it had anticipated some disruption linked to supply-chain pressures but had underestimated the size and speed of the capital expenditure shift.
Why customers delayed IBM mainframe purchases
Mainframe contracts involve more than the delivery of physical equipment. Banks, airlines, governments and other large organisations also buy operating systems, transaction-processing software, security services and long-term support. When customers postpone a mainframe upgrade, IBM can therefore lose or delay several linked sources of revenue.
The weakness was concentrated partly in IBM Z, the company’s mainframe operation, and in the transaction-processing software sold with those systems. IBM had previously described the launch of its z17 generation as the strongest opening of any mainframe programme in its history. However, the expected sales pattern did not continue through the second quarter. IBM had forecast a low-single-digit annual decline in infrastructure revenue as the z17 launch cycle began to mature. The preliminary figure was considerably weaker, with infrastructure revenue falling 7%.
Software growth was also affected because fewer mainframe transactions meant reduced demand for the associated software stack.
IBM’s strongest and weakest Q2 business areas
The preliminary announcement showed a sharply divided business:
- Software revenue rose 5%, but growth was insufficient to meet expectations.
- Red Hat revenue increased 11%, accelerating from the previous quarter.
- Consulting revenue was flat, or 1% higher after adjusting for currency movements.
- Infrastructure revenue fell 7%, driven by weaker IBM Z performance.
- Distributed infrastructure rose 37%, supported by Power and storage products.
- IBM ended the quarter with an approximately $500 million distributed-infrastructure backlog.
- The z17 programme remained nearly 130% ahead of the comparable z16 programme, despite the quarterly sales shortfall.
These figures suggest that demand for computing infrastructure did not disappear. Rather, customers changed which types of infrastructure they were prepared to buy immediately.
IBM CEO admits execution failures and delayed large deals
IBM did not attribute the entire shortfall to external market conditions. Chief executive Arvind Krishna accepted that the company reacted too slowly and failed to complete important transactions before the quarter ended.
“These conditions require our teams to execute perfectly, and this quarter we faltered” (Arvind Krishna, letter to investors, 14 July 2026). He added that IBM had not adapted quickly enough and that numerous large deals had failed to close according to their expected schedules. This admission is particularly significant because delayed contract signings can be temporary. A deal that failed to close in June could still be completed during the third quarter. However, investors will need evidence that the missed transactions were delayed rather than cancelled. They will also want to know whether IBM’s weaker performance reflects a brief purchasing disturbance or a longer-term reduction in demand for established enterprise software.
What IBM must explain in its full earnings release
IBM is scheduled to publish its completed second-quarter results and hold an investor conference call on Wednesday, 22 July 2026, at 5pm Eastern Time. The principal questions are likely to include:
- How many large contracts were delayed during June?
- What proportion of those deals is expected to close in the third quarter?
- Has IBM changed its full-year revenue or free-cash-flow guidance?
- How long does management expect the infrastructure purchasing shift to continue?
- Is the 5% software growth rate a temporary slowdown or a new underlying trend?
- How much of the weakness was linked specifically to IBM Z and transaction-processing products?
- Are customers reducing software spending or merely postponing purchasing decisions?
- Will price rises for servers and memory continue to divert budgets away from IBM products?
The answers may determine whether the current IBM stock decline is treated as a one-quarter shock or as the beginning of a broader reassessment of the company’s growth prospects.
How cybersecurity concerns affected IBM and rival stocks
IBM identified cybersecurity as a second factor behind delayed purchasing decisions. Krishna said clients had been distracted by “rapidly evolving, industry-wide cybersecurity concerns” during the quarter. Businesses are reassessing whether existing security systems can withstand faster and more sophisticated attacks produced with advanced AI tools. That uncertainty can slow other technology purchases because chief information officers may decide to reserve more money for security products, vulnerability testing and emergency infrastructure work. The effect was visible beyond IBM. Shares in several cybersecurity companies rose strongly after Krishna’s comments suggested that security spending could become a more urgent corporate priority.
The movement does not necessarily mean IBM’s software is being directly replaced by artificial intelligence. Krishna has argued that the company’s software products are not being disrupted by AI itself. The more immediate problem is competition for a limited customer technology budget.
A company that planned to spend money on new IBM software during June may instead have bought memory, storage equipment or additional security tools. The software contract could be completed later, reduced in size or cancelled altogether.
AI is changing budgets rather than simply increasing them
The episode illustrates an important distinction in the AI investment cycle. AI spending is often discussed as though it provides additional revenue for every technology supplier. In practice, corporate budgets are finite. Money directed towards graphics processors, servers, networking, cooling, electricity capacity and data storage may be removed from consulting projects, traditional software subscriptions or mainframe upgrades.
IBM therefore faces an uncomfortable position. It offers AI, cloud, data, security, consulting and infrastructure services, but it does not capture every part of the current spending boom equally. The companies benefiting most directly are often those supplying scarce physical infrastructure. IBM’s higher-margin software businesses may receive less money while customers concentrate on securing hardware capacity.
Does the IBM stock crash threaten its software transformation
IBM has spent tens of billions of dollars expanding its software and hybrid-cloud operations. Its major transactions have included the acquisition of Red Hat, HashiCorp and data-streaming company Confluent.
The strategy is intended to provide faster growth, more recurring revenue and less reliance on periodic mainframe replacement cycles. The second-quarter warning challenges that investment case because IBM’s software revenue rose only 5%, even while customers were investing heavily in technology infrastructure. Investors had expected the company’s software portfolio to offer greater protection against volatility in hardware demand.
Nevertheless, the preliminary results also contained positive indicators.
Red Hat revenue growth accelerated to 11%. IBM said HashiCorp and Confluent performed strongly, while consulting contract signings continued to grow with support from generative-AI projects. Operating pre-tax margin increased slightly on a non-GAAP basis, suggesting that IBM’s productivity measures continued to support profitability. The central issue is therefore not whether IBM has valuable software businesses. It is whether those businesses can grow rapidly enough and consistently enough to justify the valuation investors assigned to the company before the warning.
IBM’s current strategic position
| Positive factor | Risk or unresolved issue |
|---|---|
| Red Hat growth accelerated to 11% | Overall software growth slowed to 5% |
| Distributed infrastructure rose 37% | IBM Z performance missed expectations |
| Acquisitions contributed growth | Acquisitions must produce durable returns |
| Consulting signings benefited from GenAI | Consulting revenue remained flat |
| Margins showed some resilience | Revenue and EPS missed forecasts |
| Strong free-cash-flow generation | Full-year guidance requires confirmation |
| Quantum and AI investment continues | These projects may take years to produce material revenue |
IBM has also highlighted major investment in quantum computing and new AI-related initiatives. The company said it plans to invest more than $10 billion in quantum technology over five years and remains committed to delivering a large-scale fault-tolerant quantum computer by 2029. These projects may strengthen IBM’s long-term position, but they are not yet large enough to compensate immediately for weakness in software or mainframe sales.
What the IBM share price fall means for investors
The IBM share price had risen substantially before the preliminary results, supported by enthusiasm surrounding AI, hybrid cloud, quantum computing and stronger performance in the company’s first quarter.
IBM reported first-quarter revenue of $15.9 billion, up 9%, with software revenue rising 11% and infrastructure revenue increasing 15%. The sudden deterioration from those figures to only 1% total growth in the second quarter intensified the market reaction. Investors are now being asked to distinguish between three possible explanations:
A temporary purchasing disruption
Under this interpretation, customers brought forward spending on scarce servers and memory, delaying IBM contracts by several weeks. Revenue could recover if the unfinished deals close during the third quarter.
A company-specific execution problem
IBM may have failed to manage its sales pipeline, pricing or contract negotiations effectively. This would require operational corrections but would not necessarily invalidate the wider software strategy.
A structural shift in enterprise technology spending
The most serious possibility is that the AI infrastructure cycle is permanently diverting money from established software and consulting providers. If this is happening, IBM and other enterprise-software groups may face slower growth for several quarters.
The market reaction indicates that investors are assigning at least some probability to the third scenario.
What happens next for IBM stock?
The next decisive event will be IBM’s completed earnings announcement on 22 July.
The preliminary release provided selected figures but did not include the full segment detail, final cash-flow statement or a comprehensive update to annual guidance. Investors will examine whether management maintains its existing expectations for revenue growth and free cash flow.
They will also monitor the IBM share price for signs that institutional investors consider the sell-off excessive. A recovery could occur if IBM confirms that postponed deals have already closed in July or if the company maintains its full-year targets.
Further weakness would become more likely if management cuts guidance, reports additional software pressure or indicates that customer budget changes may continue into 2027.
For now, the collapse in IBM stock represents a direct market response to three connected problems: weaker-than-expected financial results, an unexpected diversion of corporate spending towards AI infrastructure and IBM’s admission that it failed to close major contracts on schedule.
The figures are preliminary, but the warning has already changed the debate around the company. IBM must now demonstrate that its software transformation remains intact and that the second-quarter shortfall was a disruption it can recover from, rather than evidence that the AI investment boom is leaving parts of its business behind.
Read about the life of Westminster and Pimlico district, London and the world. 24/7 news with fresh and useful updates on culture, business, technology and city life: Why was Heritage Live cancelled and what is known about the Sandringham concerts, line-ups and refunds
Materials used: IBM Investor Relations, IBM Newsroom, Reuters, Associated Press, market trading data.