Inheritance tax and this is money are now part of the same retirement calculation in Britain, as annuities move back into the centre of pension planning ahead of the rule change that will bring most unused pension funds and death benefits into scope for Inheritance Tax from 6 April 2027. At the same time, higher UK interest rates have materially improved annuity pricing, while official market data shows savers are still accessing pensions through both annuities and drawdown in large volumes, forcing a more technical decision about income security, tax exposure and estate planning, reported The WP Times.
The numbers explain why the subject has moved from niche advice into mainstream financial planning. The Association of British Insurers said total individual annuity premiums rose to £7.4bn in 2025, the highest annual level since pension freedoms were announced in 2014; average annuity value reached £84,000 for the first time; sales above £250,000 rose 31%; and sales above £500,000 rose 54%. The Bank of England’s official rate now stands at 3.75%, a level that has made guaranteed lifetime income more competitive than it looked during the ultra-low-rate years.
Inheritance tax on pensions from April 2027: what changes and why retirees are acting now
The most important change is not stylistic, political or theoretical. It is mechanical. HMRC has already set out that, from 6 April 2027, most unused pension funds and death benefits will be included within the value of a person’s estate for Inheritance Tax purposes. For years, pensions were widely treated as one of the cleaner estate-planning wrappers in the UK because they often sat outside the estate. That logic is being reset.
That does not mean every family will face the same tax result, and it does not mean annuities are automatically the right answer. But it does mean untouched pension wealth now needs to be reviewed differently. The standard UK Inheritance Tax rate remains 40% on the part of an estate above the threshold, and HMRC’s broader framework on gifts and estates still matters when families decide whether to leave money inside a pension, draw it, gift it, or convert part of it into guaranteed income.
What changes in practical terms
- Most unused pension funds and death benefits move into scope for IHT from 6 April 2027.
- The standard IHT rate is 40% above the relevant threshold.
- HMRC says death in service benefits payable from a registered pension scheme will be excluded from the estate for IHT purposes from that date.
- Gifts made as normal expenditure out of income can still be relevant because they may fall outside the estate immediately if the rules are met.
That is why advisers are no longer looking only at investment growth. They are now testing how a pension behaves under three pressures at once: tax at death, the need for secure retirement cash flow, and the risk of leaving too much exposed to market timing in later life. That is a more forensic question than the old drawdown-versus-annuity debate.
UK annuity rates in 2026: why higher rates have changed the maths of retirement income
Annuities were heavily weakened in the public mind during the low-rate era because the income available often looked poor relative to keeping money invested. That backdrop has changed. The Bank of England says Bank Rate is 3.75%, and the ABI says the 2025 annuity market was a record year by premium value since the 2014 pension-freedoms announcement. In plain financial terms, higher rates have improved what insurers can offer because annuity pricing is closely tied to long-dated yields and insurer return assumptions.
The 2025 ABI figures also show this is not just a volume story. Fewer annuities were sold year on year, but the value of contracts rose because people were annuitising larger pension pots. There was also an 8% rise in the number of people aged 70 and over buying an annuity, and escalating annuities rose to just over 18,000 sales, up 10% on 2024 and the highest level recorded since 2013. That indicates buyers are not simply chasing fixed income; many are trying to rebuild inflation protection into retirement cash flow.
UK annuity market indicators 2025: scale, growth and structural shift
| Indicator | 2025 level | Year-on-year change | Analytical interpretation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total individual annuity premiums | £7.4bn | ▲ Highest since 2014 | Market volumes have returned to pre–pension freedoms levels, signalling a renewed shift into guaranteed income |
| Number of annuities sold | 87,600 contracts | ▼ Slight decline | Fewer transactions but larger allocations per client, indicating more deliberate capital deployment |
| Average annuity value | £84,000 | ▲ Record high | Annuities are increasingly used as a core income strategy rather than a marginal allocation |
| Sales above £250,000 | +31% | Strong growth | Accelerating uptake among affluent retirees seeking income certainty |
| Sales above £500,000 | +54% | Fastest-growing segment | High-net-worth individuals reallocating substantial pension capital into low-risk income structures |
| Escalating (inflation-linked) annuities | 18,000+ policies | ▲ +10% | Re-emerging demand for inflation protection following the 2022–2023 price shock |
| Buyers aged 70+ | ▲ +8% | Growing share | Delayed annuitisation strategy — retirees waiting for improved rates before locking in income |
| Market structure trend | Lower volume, higher value | Structural shift | Transition from mass-market product to targeted wealth-planning instrument |
What the data indicates in practical terms
- The market is expanding through higher capital allocation, not transaction volume
- Growth is concentrated in large pension pots (£250k–£500k+), not smaller savers
- Inflation-linked products are returning as a risk-management tool, not a niche option
- Behaviour suggests a move towards strategic annuitisation, rather than default retirement choices
In analytical terms, this is not a cyclical rebound — it is a re-pricing of certainty in a higher-rate, higher-risk environment.
The analytical point is straightforward. When guaranteed income improves, the hurdle rate for drawdown rises. A retiree now has to ask not only whether investments can outperform, but whether they can do so consistently enough, after fees, taxes and withdrawals, to justify giving up certainty. That is a harder test than it was when rates were near zero.
Pension drawdown vs annuity in Britain: where the market stands after pension freedoms
Pension freedoms remain central to the UK retirement system. HM Treasury’s reforms gave savers greater control from 2015, and the FCA’s market data shows that freedom is still being used widely. In 2024/25, the FCA recorded 961,575pension plans accessed for the first time, with annuity sales up 7.8% to 88,430, while drawdown sales rose 25.5% to 349,992. The value of money withdrawn from pension pots also climbed sharply to £70.876bn.
So the market has not “returned” to annuities in an absolute sense. What has changed is the balance of use. Drawdown still offers control and access to capital, but official and consumer guidance remains clear that annuities provide guaranteed income while drawdown leaves money invested and exposed to market movement. MoneyHelper describes annuities as a way to convert some or all of a defined-contribution pension into a guaranteed income, while Citizens Advice describes drawdown as taking pension income while leaving the fund invested.
What the two approaches do differently
- Annuity: converts some or all of a pension pot into guaranteed income.
- Drawdown: leaves funds invested and allows flexible withdrawals.
- Mixed approach: part annuity, part drawdown, which some providers describe as a “fix and flex” structure.
That is why a serious retirement analysis in 2026 is less about choosing one camp and more about sequencing. Many savers now appear to be using flexibility earlier, then buying guaranteed income later, once rates are stronger and income certainty becomes more important.
Using annuities for inheritance tax planning: where the logic works and where it does not
The strongest argument for annuities in the current debate is not that they “beat” tax in a simple sense. It is that they can change the shape of wealth. Once pension capital is converted into annuity income, the retiree no longer holds that capital in the same form inside the pension wrapper. That can support a different gifting strategy, especially where income is predictable and regular. HMRC’s gifts guidance remains important here because normal expenditure out of income can be outside the estate immediately if the gifts are habitual, made from income and do not reduce the giver’s standard of living.
But the tax case is not one-directional. Annuity income is taxable as income, and the trade-off is permanent: once the contract is bought, access to capital is largely surrendered in exchange for certainty. That is why the annuity case is strongest where the retiree needs a secure income floor, expects to use surplus income actively, or wants to reduce the risk of leaving a large untouched pension exposed to the post-2027 IHT framework. It is weaker where leaving capital untouched for heirs remains the primary objective and the retiree can tolerate drawdown risk.
Where annuities may fit
- Funding core retirement spending with guaranteed cash flow.
- Creating steady income that can support regular gifting.
- Reducing reliance on market withdrawals in later life.
- Combining with drawdown rather than replacing it entirely.
The key point is precision. Annuities are not a universal inheritance-tax shield, and drawdown is not automatically superior because it preserves capital. Under the April 2027 regime, pension wealth, taxable income, estate thresholds and gift rules all interact. That is exactly why the annuity market has revived: not because the product changed, but because the policy and rate environment did.
Read about the life of Westminster and Pimlico district, London and the world. 24/7 news with fresh and useful updates on culture, business, technology and city life: Stock market crash newsletters: why risk is rising under Donald Trump as inflation shock and Fed policy threaten Wall Street
